Child work and labour among orphaned and abandoned children in five low and middle income countries
- Rachel Whetten†1Email author,
- Lynne Messer†1, 2,
- Jan Ostermann†1, 2,
- Kathryn Whetten†1, 2,
- Brian Wells Pence1, 4,
- Megan Buckner1,
- Nathan Thielman1, 3,
- Karen O'Donnell1, 5, 6 and
- The Positive Outcomes for Orphans (POFO) Research Team7
© Whetten et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 8 October 2010
Accepted: 13 January 2011
Published: 13 January 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Oct 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arthur Frank|
|26 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kirsten Johnson|
|14 Dec 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Rachel Whetten|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Dec 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Dec 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Rachel Whetten|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Dec 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Jan 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Rachel Whetten|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Jan 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Jan 2011||Editorially accepted|
|13 Jan 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-698X-11-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.