Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Child work and labour among orphaned and abandoned children in five low and middle income countries

  • Rachel Whetten1Email author,
  • Lynne Messer1, 2,
  • Jan Ostermann1, 2,
  • Kathryn Whetten1, 2,
  • Brian Wells Pence1, 4,
  • Megan Buckner1,
  • Nathan Thielman1, 3,
  • Karen O'Donnell1, 5, 6 and
  • The Positive Outcomes for Orphans (POFO) Research Team7
Contributed equally
BMC International Health and Human Rights201111:1

DOI: 10.1186/1472-698X-11-1

Received: 8 October 2010

Accepted: 13 January 2011

Published: 13 January 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Oct 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arthur Frank
26 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kirsten Johnson
14 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Rachel Whetten
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Rachel Whetten
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Rachel Whetten
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
13 Jan 2011 Editorially accepted
13 Jan 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-698X-11-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Health Policy, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University
(2)
Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University
(3)
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Duke University
(4)
Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University
(5)
Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Duke University
(6)
Center for Child and Family Health, Duke University
(7)
Membership of The Positive Outcomes for Orphans (POFO) Research Team is provided in the Acknowledgements

Advertisement