More than just a cut: a qualitative study of penile practices and their relationship to masculinity, sexuality and contagion and their implications for HIV prevention in Papua New Guinea
© Kelly et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 2 December 2011
Accepted: 27 June 2012
Published: 20 July 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|2 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Angela Kelly-Hanku|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Leickness Chisamu Simbayi|
|28 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nittaya Phanuphak|
|29 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Angela Kelly-Hanku|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Angela Kelly-Hanku|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|30 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nittaya Phanuphak|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|27 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|20 Jul 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-698X-12-10|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.