Treatment patterns of childhood diarrhoea in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional survey
© Löfgren et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 14 December 2011
Accepted: 27 August 2012
Published: 25 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eduardo Salazar-Lindo|
|2 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charles Larson|
|30 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Birger Carl Forsberg|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charles Larson|
|3 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Birger Carl Forsberg|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charles Larson|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|27 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|25 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-698X-12-19|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.