Iraqi primary care system in Kurdistan region: providers’ perspectives on problems and opportunities for improvement
© Shabila et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 30 September 2011
Accepted: 26 September 2012
Published: 27 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|30 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - nadia abdulhadi|
|28 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sharmila Mhatre|
|21 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Nazar Shabila|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - nadia abdulhadi|
|10 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sharmila Mhatre|
|29 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Nazar Shabila|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|29 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ted Schrecker|
|26 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Nazar Shabila|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|26 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|4 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Nazar Shabila|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|4 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|26 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|27 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-698X-12-21|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.