Changes to the law on consent in South Africa: implications for school-based adolescent sexual and reproductive health research
© Zuch et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 3 May 2011
Accepted: 10 April 2012
Published: 10 April 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 May 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adrian Guta|
|26 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann Strode|
|2 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Melanie Zuch|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adrian Guta|
|15 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Melanie Zuch|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adrian Guta|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|10 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|10 Apr 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-698X-12-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.