Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Tuberculosis in the era of infection with the human immunodeficiency virus: assessment and comparison of community knowledge of both infections in rural Uganda

  • Ashley Wynne1,
  • Gian S Jhangri1,
  • Solina Richter2,
  • Arif Alibhai1,
  • Tom Rubaale3 and
  • Walter Kipp1Email author
BMC International Health and Human Rights201212:36

DOI: 10.1186/1472-698X-12-36

Received: 23 July 2012

Accepted: 11 December 2012

Published: 20 December 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
23 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ludwig Apers
6 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emanuele Pontali
24 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Walter Kipp
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emanuele Pontali
10 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ludwig Apers
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Dec 2012 Editorially accepted
20 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-698X-12-36

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Public Health, University of Alberta
Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta
Health Department, Kabarole District Administration