A comparative study of Taiwan's short-term medical missions to the South Pacific and Central America

  • Ya-Wen Chiu1, 2Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Yi-Hao Weng3,

      Affiliated with

      • Chih-Fu Chen4,

        Affiliated with

        • Chun-Yuh Yang5,

          Affiliated with

          • Hung-Yi Chiou6 and

            Affiliated with

            • Ming-Liang Lee7

              Affiliated with

              BMC International Health and Human Rights201212:37

              DOI: 10.1186/1472-698X-12-37

              Received: 28 August 2012

              Accepted: 18 December 2012

              Published: 27 December 2012

              Abstract

              Background

              Taiwan has been dispatching an increasing number of short-term medical missions (STMMs) to its allied nations to provide humanitarian health care; however, overall evaluations to help policy makers strengthen the impact of such missions are lacking. Our primary objective is to identify useful strategies by comparing STMMs to the South Pacific and Central America.

              Methods

              The data for the evaluation come from two main sources: the official reports of 46 missions to 11 countries in Central America and 25 missions to 8 countries in the South Pacific, and questionnaires completed by health professionals who had participated in the above missions. In Central America, STMMs were staffed by volunteer health professionals from multiple institutions. In the South Pacific, STMMs were staffed by volunteer health professionals from single institutions.

              Results

              In comparison to STMMs to Central America, STMMs to the South Pacific accomplished more educational training for local health providers, including providing heath-care knowledge and skills (p<0.05), and training in equipment administration (p<0.001) and drug administration (p<0.005). In addition, language constraints were more common among missions to Central America (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the performance of clinical service between the two regions.

              Conclusions

              Health-care services provided by personnel from multiple institutions are as efficient as those from single institutions. Proficiency in the native language and provision of education for local health-care workers are essential for conducting a successful STMM. Our data provide implications for integrating evidence into the deployment of STMMs.

              Keywords

              Medical missions Health professional Language Education Efficiency

              Background

              Medical missions are a means of extending the reach of healthcare professionals to the underdeveloped world. A number of organizations and countries provide medical care through such initiatives [15]. Such endeavors improve health for people worldwide and reduce the health disparity among populations. They can have a significant impact on not only patients but also the healthcare workers themselves [6, 7]. The success of these efforts has the additional benefit of helping improve the willingness of health professionals to volunteer to serve in underdeveloped locations [8]. Medical missions are categorized into short- and long-term operations. Over the years, as many long-term healthcare operations have been replaced by sector-wide approaches, there has been a shift in focus from long-term overseas assignments to short-term medical missions (STMMs) [9]. There are three types of STMMs: emergency, surgical, and mobile services. Emergency services provide post-disaster medical relief care anywhere in the world. Surgical services provide dental and surgical aid in regions where such services are generally unavailable [7]. Mobile services provide clinics in outlying villages where medical care is either lacking or inadequate.

              Concerns have been raised regarding the long-term impact of STMMs on recipient communities [1012]. Constraints against such missions include a lack of follow-up care, short duration, too many patients, linguistic and cultural barriers, limited medications and supplies, and a lack of support services from local authorities. An understanding of partnerships between the humanitarian organization and its host country is beneficial to reduce the risks to aid workers and the potential harm to recipients [13]. Therefore, a standardized deployment strategy is required to assure their quality [14, 15].

              A variety of healthcare professionals have engaged in providing humanitarian aid through STMMs for decades; but few studies have examined their perceptions [4, 11, 12, 16, 17]. Quantitative studies investigating the efficiency of STMMs could help improve the implementation of such missions. In an attempt to determine helpful strategies for the deployment of STMMs, we conducted a cohort survey to analyze Taiwan’s STMMs dispatched to the South Pacific and Central America. We have developed a profile of STMMs and identified important characteristics worthy of further attention.

              Taiwan’s STMMs

              The Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (TaiwanICDF) is the principal official body superintending Taiwan’s overseas cooperative programs. Since 2005, the TaiwanICDF has coordinated with 37 hospitals to dispatch groups of health professionals, in the form of STMMs, to Taiwan’s partner countries. Therefore, many health professionals have been called upon to provide short-term medical care to patients in villages in underdeveloped countries. The dispatch of STMMs is to improve the healthcare environments of Taiwan’s allies by offering education and training, as well as guidance, experience, and methodologies regarding disease control as practiced in Taiwan. These efforts involve groups of healthcare personnel traveling to medically underserved areas far from Taiwan.

              Preparedness of STMMs

              Taiwan’s allies include 11 countries in Central America (Guatemala, Honduras, Haiti, Saint Lucia, Nicaragua, Panama, El Salvador, Belize, Dominican Republic, Paraguay, and Saint Kitts and Nevis) and 8 countries in the South Pacific (Kiribati, Papua New Guinea, Tuvalu, Palau, the Solomon Islands, the Marshall Islands, Fiji, and Nauru). The official language is Spanish in most of these countries in Central America (63.6%), including Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, El Salvador, Dominican Republic, and Paraguay. In contrast, the official language in all of these South Pacific countries is English (100%).

              Diplomatic officials with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) of the Republic of China (Taiwan) arrange meetings with medical officers in their host nation whenever STMMs are requested. Surveys are conducted to gather relevant information, including the how long the mission would last, what specialties mission personnel might need, the locations of mobile clinics, licensure of medical care, and issues relating to the import of drugs and equipment.

              Recruitment of STMM members

              Once a mission is confirmed, the TaiwanICDF recruits health professionals from cooperating hospitals. STMMs comprise a team of specialist physicians (mainly internists, surgeons, dentists, and pediatricians), experienced nurses, pharmacists, and public health personnel. Fluency in English is required. All members receive disease prophylaxis, such as vaccinations, prior to departure [18].

              The Taiwanese government encourages Taiwanese medical institutions to cooperate with medical institutions of allies in the South Pacific by providing short-term clinical services and technical support. Agreement has also been reached to formulate a Taiwan-Pacific Medical Alliance. Table 1 summarizes the relationships between sister hospitals in Taiwan and the South Pacific. Overall, six Taiwanese medical institutions are twinned with eight South Pacific hospitals, with each Taiwanese medical institution recruiting team members from within its own institute for deployment to host nations. In contrast, each STMM dispatched to Central America is staffed by volunteer health professionals from multiple institutions.
              Table 1

              Sister hospitals for STMMs to the South Pacific

              Country

              Sister hospital

              Sister hospital in Taiwan

              Kiribati

              Tungaru Central Hospital

              Mackay Memorial Hospital

              Tuvalu

              Princess Margaret Hospital

              Chung Shan Medical University Hospital

              Palau

              Palau National Hospital

              Wan Fang Hospital

              Solomon Islands

              Honiara Central Referral Hospital

              Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

              Marshall Islands

              Majuro Hospital

              Wan Fang Hospital

              Nauru

              Nauru General Hospital

              Show Chwan Memorial Hospital

              Fiji

              Colonial War Memorial Hospital

              Mackay Memorial Hospital

              Papua New Guinea

              Wewak Boram hospital

              Changhua Christian Hospital

              A comparison of the preparedness of STMMs to the South Pacific and to Central America is summarized in Table 2. The most significant difference between the two regions was the single- or multiple-institution nature of mission recruitment and the presence or absence of sister hospitals in host nations. There was no difference in the funding sources, leadership, administration, logistical preparedness, or orientation between the two regions.
              Table 2

              Preparedness of STMMs dispatched to the South Pacific and Central America

                 Region

              South pacific number of missions = 46

              Central America number of missions = 25

              Funding source

              MOFA, TaiwanICDF

              MOFA, TaiwanICDF

              Mission leader

              TaiwanICDF

              TaiwanICDF

              Administrative personnel

              TaiwanICDF

              TaiwanICDF

              Logistical preparedness

              TaiwanICDF

              TaiwanICDF

              Orientation

              TaiwanICDF

              TaiwanICDF

              Member recruitment

              Single institutions

              Multiple institutions

               Doctors

              Specialty

              Specialty

               Nurses

              Senior

              Senior

               Other

              Experienced

              Experienced

              Sister hospital in host nation

              Yes

              No

              Logistics and orientation of STMMs

              MOFA and the TaiwanICDF sponsor all costs associated with STMMs, including transportation and travel, daily expenses, logistical support, medication and supplies, laboratory capabilities, and accommodation. Drugs and equipment are prepared by participating hospitals in accordance with guidelines published by the World Health Organization and the International Dispensary Association [6]. No medications are obtained locally.

              The TaiwanICDF arranges a two-hour orientation for all participants one to two weeks before each STMM is dispatched. The content of this program of orientation includes an introduction to the host nation and its medical problems, a mission schedule, and information on the duties of STMM members. Each participant receives a booklet about the current mission and travel destination. The quality of each orientation is similar.

              Medical services

              Once members of STMMs have arrived in the field, diplomats from Taiwan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs arrange local transportation and accommodation for them. Those on STMMs are instructed to minimize any disruption to the culture of their host countries, conform to levels of local health care, and facilitate cooperation with local healthcare workers, including medical students.

              Methods

              Study population

              The targets were members of STMMs dispatched by TaiwanICDF to the South Pacific and Central America during 2005 to 2010.

              Daily reports of STMMs

              During the mission period, STMM members complete daily work records, which are collated, compiled, and included in the single-volume final report that documents the work of each STMM. In this study, all reports (a total of 71 volumes) from 2005 to 2010 were collected for review. Data retrieved included locations, mission duration, mission size, and patient numbers. Educational materials provided by members of STMMs were also collected. The missions to the South Pacific and Central America were then analyzed, especially for any differences.

              Questionnaire survey for members of STMMs

              A postal questionnaire survey was provided to all STMM members participating in the missions dispatched by TaiwanICDF to the South Pacific and Central America during 2005 to 2010. The development of the questionnaire to assess STMMs was based on a comprehensive literature review of publications of existing questionnaires [5, 14]. In this survey, the content validity index of 0.94 and Cronbach’s coefficient alpha of 0.73 indicate sufficient validity and reliability of parameters in the questionnaire.

              The questionnaire was anonymously distributed to all members of 71 STMMs in a four-month period from January through April 2011. An introductory letter that stated the purpose of this study and assured confidentiality was accompanied. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan.

              The questionnaire consisted of items for measuring the perceptions and efficiency of STMMs. The efficiency portion covered orientation efforts, intra-team communication, utilization of time, educational training of local health workers, necessary personnel, health care, and interpreter services. Questions regarding efficiency of STMMs were rated by Likert’s 5-point scale (completely agree, agree, neutral, disagree, completely disagree). In addition, questions about proficiency in the language of the destination country and knowledge of local culture were asked. Furthermore, background characteristics — including gender, age, marital status, academic degree, profession, and work experience — were also explored.

              Statistical analyses

              Statistical analyses were conducted using a commercially available program (SPSS 12.0 for Windows, SPSS Inc., Illinois, USA). Likert’s 5-point scale was dichotomized for further analyses. A self-rating report of either agree or completely agree was regarded as a favorable answer. The other three (neutral, disagree, and completely disagree) were viewed as unfavorable perceptions. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. For comparison between groups with quantitative variables, the null hypothesis that there was no difference between each group was tested by ANOVA. Significance was defined as p < 0.05.

              Results

              Taiwanese STMMs

              During the six-year study period, the TaiwanICDF organized 71 medical missions to 19 countries, including 25 missions to 11 nations in Central America and 46 missions to 8 nations in the South Pacific. Table 3 summarizes the details of these missions. The length of each mission ranged from 5 to 14 working days, while the number of members per mission ranged from 5 to 22 persons, the number of patients per mission ranged from 15 to 4,659 persons, and the number of locations per mission ranged from 1 to 10.
              Table 3

              Structure of STMMs dispatched to the South Pacific and Central America

              Country

              STMM number

              Size (Personnel)

              Working days

              Number of service locations

              Patients

              Central America, in total

              25

              271

              231

              107

              52179

               Guatemala

              5

              10–12

              10–13

              4–10

              3046–4659

               Honduras

              3

              10–12

              7–10

              2–4

              1374–2629

               Haiti

              3

              9–15

              8–12

              1–4

              183–4224

               Saint Lucia

              1

              10

              6

              5

              252

               Nicaragua

              2

              11–14

              8–10

              2–4

              2600–2661

               Panama

              2

              8–10

              9–10

              5–10

              1566–1566

               El Salvador

              2

              11–13

              10

              4

              3083–3513

               Belize

              1

              11

              9

              6

              739

               Dominican

              1

              15

              7

              3

              890

               Paraguay

              3

              7–11

              5–11

              1–4

              15–1186

               Saint Kitts and Nevis

              2

              9

              8–9

              3–4

              184–441

              South Pacific, in total

              46

              417

              385

              124

              32708

               Kiribati

              8

              6–11

              5–9

              1

              300–787

               Papua New Guinea

              2

              10–22

              9

              4–7

              416–668

               Tuvalu

              8

              5–10

              7–10

              1–4

              395–912

               Palau

              4

              7–12

              5–14

              1–6

              300–864

               Solomon Islands

              5

              8–18

              6–10

              5–9

              340–2393

               Marshall Islands

              9

              7–13

              6–13

              1–4

              294–996

               Fiji

              3

              7–12

              6–8

              4–6

              300–1199

               Nauru

              7

              6–11

              5–10

              1–2

              476–1141

              STMM services

              The services provided by STMMs are summarized in Table 4. For both the South Pacific and Central America, STMM’s main health professionals were medical doctors. Pharmacists were not always enrolled in STMMs. There were significant structural differences in the STMMs — including the number of mission members (p < 0.01), the number of patients (p < 0.001), and location (p < 0.01). In Central America, the most common locations visited were communities; in the South Pacific, hospitals. Missions to the South Pacific more often provided educational training (such as lectures, written media, and hands-on training) — including knowledge and skills in health care (p < 0.05), equipment administration (such as maintenance of medical equipment) (p < 0.001), and drug administration (such as usage of medications) (p < 0.005) — to local health professionals than those in Central America.
              Table 4

              Services provided by 46 STMMs to the South Pacific and 25 STMMs to Central America

                 Region

              South Pacific N =46

              Central America N =25

              P value

              Size (person/mission)

              9.07 ± 0.46

              10.84 ± 0.41

              < 0.01

              Primary care professionals

              7.43 ± 0.36

              9.24 ± 0.39

              < 0.005

               Doctors

              5.35 ± 0.24

              6.12 ± 0.31

               

               Nurses

              1.59 ± 0.13

              2.16 ± 0.07

               

               Pharmacists

              0.49 ± 0.08

              0.96 ± 0.09

               

              Working day (days/mission)

              8.37 ± 0.28

              9.24 ± 0.38

              0.0685

              Patient (patients/mission)

              711 ± 54

              2087 ± 314

              < 0.001

              Location (locations/mission)

              2.70 ± 0.32

              4.28 ± 0.48

              < 0.01

               Hospital

              1.31 ± 0.09

              1.40 ± 0.24

               

               Primary care center

              0.72 ± 0.20

              1.24 ± 0.34

               

               Community (e.g. school)

              0.67 ± 0.15

              1.64 ± 0.52

               

              Education (%)

                 

               For health workers

                 

                Knowledge and skills in health care

              46 (100.0)

              21 (84)

              < 0.05

                Equipment administration

              34 (73.9)

              7 (28)

              < 0.001

                Drug administration

              23 (50.0)

              3 (12)

              < 0.005

              For the general population

                 

                Public health

              46 (100.0)

              23 (92)

              0.12

              Perceptions and efficiency of STMMs

              Questionnaires were mailed to 383 health professionals who had participated in STMMs dispatched by TaiwanICDF to the South Pacific or Central America. Among them, 253 questionnaires (66.1%) were valid for analyses, including 153 from missions dispatched to the South Pacific and 100 from missions dispatched to Central America. Their personal characteristics are provided in Table 5. There was no significant difference in the demographic data between personnel of the South Pacific and Central America — including in the areas of gender, age, marital status, working experience, academic degree, and profession.
              Table 5

              Demographic data of 253 health professionals participating in STMMs

                 Region

              South Pacific N = 153

              Central America N = 100

              P value

              Age (years)

              41.0 ± 8.6

              40.9 ± 10.5

              0.876

              Working period (years)

              13.7 ± 8.4

              13.9 ± 9.3

              0.866

              Gender (male, %)

              82 (53.6)

              50 (50.0)

              0.576

              Married (%)

              81 (52.9)

              45 (45.0)

              0.217

              Academic degree (%)

                

              0.057

               High school or below

              13 (8.5)

              4 (4.0)

               

               College*

              79 (51.6)

              68 (68.0)

               

               Master’s

              48 (31.4)

              20 (20.0)

               

               Ph.D.

              13 (8.5)

              8 (8.0)

               

              Profession

                

              0.994

               Doctor

              79 (51.6)

              51 (51.0)

               

               Nurse

              45 (29.4)

              30 (30.0)

               

               Allied health profession

              29 (19.0)

              19 (19.0)

               

              * College curriculum is 7 years for medical school, 6 year for dental school, and 4 years for the other specialties.

              Health professionals’ perceptions and efficiency of STMMs are summarized in Table 6. Frequently cited reasons for their engagement in STMMs included personal development (78.7%), providing health care (76.3%), and helping Taiwan’s diplomatic relations (72.7%). Less than half of participants rated training for local health providers as an important goal (46.6%). There were no significant differences in the expectations of participation in STMMs between health professionals in missions in the South Pacific and those in Central America. Furthermore, health personnel in missions of the South Pacific perceived a better ability to speak the local language than those in Central America (p < 0.001). They less often required interpreters for clinical practice (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the following perceptions between STMMs of the South Pacific and those of Central America: knowledge of local culture, orientation efforts, intra-team communication, utilization of time, and necessary personnel.
              Table 6

              Perceptions of 253 health professionals toward STMMs

              Perception

              South Pacific N = 153

              Central America N = 100

              P value

              Expectation

                 

               Health care

              113 (73.9)

              80 (80.0)

              0.261

               Personal development

              123 (80.4)

              76 (76.0)

              0.405

               Enhance Taiwan’s diplomatic relationship

              109 (71.2)

              75 (75.0)

              0.512

               Training for local health providers

              69 (45.1)

              49 (49.0)

              0.543

              Belief

                 

               Language proficiency enhances efficiency

              129 (84.3)

              85 (85.0)

              0.883

               Cultural awareness enhances care quality

              139 (90.8)

              89 (89.0)

              0.630

               Education helps local health providers to improve clinical care

              137 (89.5)

              87 (87.0)

              0.602

               Subsequent follow-up improves care outcome

              142 (38.6)

              91 (91.0)

              0.535

              Requirement of interpreter service

              104 (68.0)

              97 (97.0)

              <0.001

              Ability to speak the native language

                

              <0.001

               None

              17 (11.1)

              50 (50.0)

               

               Basic

              56 (36.6)

              37 (37.0)

               

               Conversational

              59 (38.6)

              9 (9.0)

               

               Proficient

              13 (8.5)

              3 (3.0)

               

               Fluent

              8 (5.2)

              1 (1.0)

               

              Knowledge of local culture

                

              0.306

               None

              18 (11.8)

              14 (14.0)

               

               A little

              46 (30.1)

              38 (38.0)

               

               Average

              70 (45.7)

              42 (42.0)

               

               Know well

              18 (11.8)

              6 (6.0)

               

               Extremely familiar with

              1 (0.6)

              0 (0.0)

               

              Efficiency (%)

                 

               Orientation efforts were well organized

              99 (64.7)

              62 (62.0)

              0.662

               Intra-team communication was efficient

              121 (79.1)

              74 (74.0)

              0.347

               Time was spent efficiently

              122 (79.7)

              82 (82.0)

              0.656

               Health care services were satisfied

              129 (84.3)

              86 (86.0)

              0.714

               Necessary personnel were sufficient

              36 (23.5)

              25 (25.0)

              0.789

               Interpreter services were adequate

              150 (98.0)

              100 (100.0)

              0.159

               Education of local health providers was well organized

              80 (52.3)

              44 (44.0)

              0.197

              Discussion

              This study represents the first large-scale cohort analysis to address Taiwan’s provision of STMMs. We have identified the scope and content of Taiwan’s STMMs sponsored by the TaiwanICDF. Our results demonstrate that most participants were satisfied with intra-team communication, interpreter services, and healthcare services. These findings suggest that STMMs established by the TaiwanICDF are well planned and efficient in providing health care to host nations. We found five main common characteristics among Taiwan’s STMMs. First, the TaiwanICDF collaborated with 37 hospitals to offer the medical contingent from surge capacity. Second, the health logistics are delivered from Taiwan. Third, STMM personnel are mostly physicians. Fourth, local inhabitants, including expatriates, made up part of the healthcare team through collaborative effort (data not shown). And fifth, the missions are mobile; with most serving multiple locations.

              STMMs can provide unique experiences for their participants. In developed countries, many institutes arrange electives to participate in health care overseas [2, 8]. They provide global health education to broaden physicians’ own clinical practices and enhance their humanitarian efforts. The success of STMMs has the benefit of helping improve the willingness of health professionals to volunteer to serve in underdeveloped locations. Other than the short orientation STMM members receive, there is no training program in Taiwan yet for medical missions.

              In our study, approximately three-fourths of participants rated STMMs as a means to gain and maintain diplomatic friendships. In contrast to religious and faith-based organizations [19, 20], Taiwan’s STMMs are mobilized on the basis of diplomatic considerations: Only a relatively small group of countries recognize the sovereignty of the Republic of China (Taiwan) [5, 21]. Health aid to resource-limited countries has been proposed as a useful method to gain their friendship [22, 23]. Taiwan has official diplomatic relations with only twenty-three nations, making this consideration perhaps different than it would be for people in many other countries. In an attempt to help both foster and cement diplomatic ties, the TaiwanICDF was established to represent Taiwan in overseas cooperation projects. Its funding comes from Taiwan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In addition to providing medical aid, the TaiwanICDF aims to promote international relations between Taiwan and its developing partner nations. Providing economic assistance and foreign aid (such as grants, loans, and technical support) to diplomatic allies is part of Taiwan’s foreign policy [21]. On the other hand, the deployment of Taiwanese STMMs is based on Taiwan’s strategic interests and is designed to rally international support to break through diplomatic barriers set by the People’s Republic of China [21, 23]. Therefore, Taiwan’s health aid is not only a humanitarian gesture but also a political consideration.

              The number of health professionals who volunteer for STMMs has been rising quickly [24]. Although teamwork is an important factor in guiding the success of STMMs, very little research has been done to investigate the methods by which healthcare personnel are enrolled; and most articles on the subject are from self-published reports [1, 7, 9, 12, 19, 25]. STMM members from multiple institutions may be unfamiliar with one another; managing such STMMs to ensure successful cooperation is therefore a challenge. In this study, we used a comparative survey to investigate the efficiency of STMMs. Our study demonstrated that STMMs in Central America and those in the South Pacific have similar efficiency, which suggests that clinical service provided by STMMs from multiple institutions has been as efficient as that of missions from a single institution.

              In addition to the recruitment, we have disclosed two significant issues. First, language is an important skill in STMMs, with language barriers impairing communication between patients and healthcare providers [13]. Most mission members do not master Spanish. Our findings suggest that the development of a Spanish class focusing on medical terminology may be necessary to promote language proficiency among those who join STMMs to Central America. However, finding qualified teachers and teaching material, especially for the languages of remote tribes, is sometimes impossible outside the local setting. In addition, there is the question of how much language proficiency could practically be obtained in advance, especially for missions that may last only one or two weeks. Given the high level of satisfaction with the interpreters that were assigned to such missions, language did not appear to pose a substantial obstacle to STMMs that had translators available. Nonetheless, in cases where medical aid workers can speak additional languages, it would be beneficial to match, if possible, their service to destinations where such languages are spoken.

              Second, our results indicate that most health professionals believed education can help local health workers to improve their knowledge and skills in health care. Although STMMs yield invaluable learning experiences, they fare less well in generating a meaningful, long-term impact on the provision of health care to local populations. It has been proposed that teaching is the most effective role played by STMMs, with capacity building through partnerships with local health workers being the most valuable [1, 14, 26, 27]. Activities such as teacher training should be as important as individual encounters with patients. However, health personnel serving in Taiwan’s STMMs were often too busy to train local health workers. Furthermore, our study indicates that relatively little education was provided to local health workers by STMMs staffed from multiple institutions, especially in training for the administration of equipment (28%) and drugs (12%). This difference could be associated with several factors. First, there may be a lack of consensus among STMM members from multiple institutions about how to teach local health workers. Second, language is a significant barrier for missions to Central America. Third, there may be insufficient time to teach local health workers due to the heavier clinical loads that missions to Central America typically have. And fourth, the predominance of community-based missions to Central America and the Caribbean may limit educational opportunities for local health workers.

              A couple of methodological issues should be cautiously interpreted in this study. First, inaccuracy may occur by reviewing the daily reports of STMMs. In this study, we used a questionnaire survey to reduce such possible bias. Second, our questionnaire is a self-estimated survey and did not explore the quality of health care. It may not reflect actual behavior in real-life situations. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of STMMs on the care outcome in recipient nations.

              Conclusions

              This study has important implications for conducting a successful STMM. First, for the purpose of analysis, we drew a distinction between a STMM whose team came from a single hospital and one whose team came from multiple hospitals. The data demonstrate that multiple-hospital teams were as efficient in providing health care as those from just one hospital. However, missions recruited from multiple hospitals provided less educational training for local health workers. Second, our findings suggest proficiency in the native language of the target area is essential for the improvement of health care. Thus, development of classes in medical Spanish may be necessary for STMMs to Central America. Third, education for local healthcare workers is necessary to promote their skills in clinical care. STMMs should not only take care of patients in villages of underdeveloped countries but also improve the ability of local health care. In summary, this study has developed evidence-based policy recommendations to prepare for the provision of STMMs. We have identified some essential factors that could provide stakeholders and policymakers in building up STMMs. The findings in this study may provide further impetus for integrating evidence into the deployment of STMMs.

              Abbreviations

              STMM: 

              Short-term medical mission

              TaiwanICDF: 

              Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund

              MOFA: 

              Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

              Declarations

              Acknowledgements

              The authors wish to thank Ms. Yu-Chun Tseng and Mr. Jun-Han Lee of the National Health Research Institutes for their assistance with data collection.

              Funding

              This study was supported by research grant number PH-100-SP-09 from the National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan.

              Authors’ Affiliations

              (1)
              Division of Preventive Medicine and Health Services Research, Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes
              (2)
              Master Program in Global Health and Development, College of Public Health and Nutrition, Taipei Medical University
              (3)
              Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine
              (4)
              International Cooperation and Development Fund
              (5)
              Department of Public Health, Kaohsiung Medical University
              (6)
              School of Public Health, College of Public Health and Nutrition, Taipei Medical University
              (7)
              Taiwan Health Corps

              References

              1. Walsh DS: A framework for short-term humanitarian health care projects. Int Nurs Rev 2004, 51:23–26.PubMedView Article
              2. Panosian C, Coates TJ: The new medical “missionaries” — grooming the next generation of global health workers. N Eng J Med 2006, 354:1771–1773.View Article
              3. Mulvaney SW, McBeth J: Medical humanitarian missions. Am Fam Physician 2009, 79:359–360.PubMed
              4. Martiniuk AL, Manouchehrian M, Negin JA, Zwi AB: Brain gains: a literature review of medical missions to low and middle-income countries. BMC Health Serv Res 2012, 12:134.PubMedView Article
              5. Chiu YW, Weng YH, Chen CF, Yang CY, Lee ML: Perceptions and efficiency of short-term medical aid missions among key groups of health professionals. Eval Health Prof 2012. Epub ahead of print
              6. Johnson CA, Stieglitz N, Schroeder ME: Opportunities and responsibilities for pharmacists on short-term medical mission teams. J Am Pharm Assoc 2009, 49:801–807.View Article
              7. Dupuis CC: Humanitarian missions in the third world: a polite dissent. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004, 113:433–435.PubMedView Article
              8. Thompson MJ, Huntington MK, Hunt DD, Pinsky LE, Brodie JJ: Educational effects of international health electives on U.S. and Canadian medical students and residents: a literature review. Acad Med 2003, 78:342–347.PubMedView Article
              9. Bajkiewicz C: Evaluating short-term missions: how can we improve? J Christ Nurs 2009, 26:110–114.PubMed
              10. Bishop R, Litch JA: Medical tourism can do harm. Br Med J 2000, 320:1017.View Article
              11. Green T, Green H, Scandlyn J, Kestler A: Perceptions of short-term medical volunteer work: a qualitative study in Guatemala. Global Health 2009, 5:4.PubMedView Article
              12. Jesus JE: Ethical challenges and considerations of short-term international medical initiatives: an excursion to Ghana as a case study. Ann Emerg Med 2010, 55:17–22.PubMedView Article
              13. Suchdev P, Ahrens K, Click E, Macklin L, Evangelista D, Graham E: A model for sustainable short-term international medical trips. Ambul Pediatr 2007, 7:317–320.PubMedView Article
              14. Maki J, Qualls M, White B, Kleefield S, Crone R: Health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: a methods study to evaluate quality of care. BMC Health Serv Res 2008, 8:121.PubMedView Article
              15. Mendoza RL: Public health policy and medical missions in the Philippines: the case of oral-facial clefting. Asia Pac J Public Health 2009, 21:94–103.PubMedView Article
              16. Hunt MR: Strengths and challenges in the use of interpretive description: reflections arising from a study of the moral experience of health professionals in humanitarian work. Qual Health Res 2009, 19:1284–1292.PubMedView Article
              17. Bjerneld M, Lindmark G, Diskett P, Garrett MJ: Perceptions of work in humanitarian assistance: interviews with returning Swedish health professionals. Disaster Manag Response 2004, 2:101–108.PubMedView Article
              18. Solheim J: Third world humanitarian medical trips — are they safe? J Emerg Nurs 2010, 36:67–70.PubMedView Article
              19. Bowman A, Gately B: Pakistan medical missions: an extension of our skills as emergency room nurses. J Emerg Nurs 2007, 33:463–467.PubMedView Article
              20. Hoover EL, Cole-Hoover G, Berry PK, Hoover ET, Harris B, Rageh D, Weaver WL: Private volunteer medical organizations: how effective are they? J Natl Med Assoc 2005, 97:270–275.PubMed
              21. Chan G: Taiwan as an emerging foreign aid donor: developments, problems, and prospects. Pac Aff 1997, 70:37–56.View Article
              22. Kickbusch I: Global health diplomacy: how foreign policy can influence health. Br Med J 2011, 342:d3154.View Article
              23. Tubilewicz C, Guilloux A: Does size matter? foreign aid in Taiwan’s diplomatic strategy, 2000–8. Aust J Int Aff 2011, 65:322–339.View Article
              24. Lane C, Glassman A: Bigger and better? Scaling up and innovation in health aid. Health Aff 2007, 26:935–948.View Article
              25. Hoover EL, Cole-Hoover G, Berry PK, Hoover ET, Harris B, Rageh D, Weaver WL: Medical volunteers: guidelines for success and safety. J Natl Med Assoc 2005, 97:85–90.PubMed
              26. Bailey BJ: Medical missions to Vietnam and Cuba: lessons in global education. Laryngoscope 2007, 117:1703–1709.PubMedView Article
              27. Murray JS: Pediatric nursing health care delivery plan for humanitarian missions in developing countries. Pediatr Nurs 1999, 25:387–392.PubMed
              28. Pre-publication history

                1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1472-698X/​12/​37/​prepub

              Copyright

              © Chiu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

              This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.