Corruption in the health care sector: A barrier to access of orthopaedic care and medical devices in Uganda
© Bouchard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 1 July 2011
Accepted: 24 April 2012
Published: 3 May 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Jul 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Jul 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Maryse Bouchard|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Jul 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - tim carey|
|1 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Coughlin|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Maryse Bouchard|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|20 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|22 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - tim carey|
|9 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Maryse Bouchard|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|9 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|24 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|3 May 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-698X-12-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.