Barriers to the participation of people with psychosocial disability in mental health policy development in South Africa: a qualitative study of perspectives of policy makers, professionals, religious leaders and academics
© Kleintjes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 13 August 2012
Accepted: 27 February 2013
Published: 11 March 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Aug 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Rowe|
|5 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marian Barnes|
|12 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - wendy cross|
|21 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Sharon Kleintjes|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Rowe|
|8 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marian Barnes|
|22 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Sharon Kleintjes|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|22 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|27 Feb 2013||Editorially accepted|
|11 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-698X-13-17|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.