Social disorganization and history of child sexual abuse against girls in sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel analysis
© Yahaya et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 27 September 2012
Accepted: 26 July 2013
Published: 7 August 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Ismail Yahaya|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mzikazi Nduna|
|9 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paula Braitstein|
|29 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - George Zhang|
|31 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Ismail Yahaya|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|31 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paula Braitstein|
|23 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - George Zhang|
|11 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Ismail Yahaya|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|11 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|26 Jul 2013||Editorially accepted|
|7 Aug 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-698X-13-33|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.