Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Disease patterns and clinical outcomes of patients admitted in intensive care units of tertiary referral hospitals of Tanzania

  • Hendry R Sawe1Email author,
  • Juma A Mfinanga1,
  • Salum J Lidenge2,
  • Boniventura CT Mpondo3,
  • Silas Msangi4,
  • Edwin Lugazia1,
  • Victor Mwafongo1,
  • Michael S Runyon1, 6 and
  • Teri A Reynolds1, 5
BMC International Health and Human Rights201414:26

DOI: 10.1186/1472-698X-14-26

Received: 20 January 2014

Accepted: 11 September 2014

Published: 23 September 2014

Abstract

Background

In sub-Saharan Africa the availability of intensive care unit (ICU) services is limited by a variety of factors, including lack of financial resources, lack of available technology and well-trained staff. Tanzania has four main referral hospitals, located in zones so as to serve as tertiary level referral centers. All the referral hospitals have some ICU services, operating at varying levels of equipment and qualified staff. We analyzed and describe the disease patterns and clinical outcomes of patients admitted in ICUs of the tertiary referral hospitals of Tanzania.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of ICU patient records, for three years (2009 to 2011) from all tertiary referral hospitals of Tanzania, namely Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH), Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC), Mbeya Referral Hospital (MRH) and Bugando Medical Centre (BMC).

Results

MNH is the largest of the four referral hospitals with 1300 beds, and MRH is the smallest with 480 beds. The ratio of hospital beds to ICU beds is 217:1 at MNH, 54:1 at BMC, 39:1 at KCMC, and 80:1 at MRH. KCMC had no infusion pumps. None of the ICUs had a point-of-care (POC) arterial blood gas (ABG) analyzer. None of the ICUs had an Intensive Care specialist or a nutritionist. A masters-trained critical care nurse was available only at MNH. From 2009–2011, the total number of patients admitted to the four ICUs was 5627, male to female ratio 1.4:1, median age of 34 years. Overall, Trauma (22.2%) was the main disease category followed by infectious disease (19.7%). Intracranial injury (12.5%) was the leading diagnosis in all age groups, while pneumonia (11.7%) was the leading diagnosis in pediatric patients (<18 years). Patients with tetanus (2.4%) had the longest median length ICU stay: 8 (5,13) days. The overall in-ICU mortality rate was 41.4%.

Conclusions

The ICUs in tertiary referral hospitals of Tanzania are severely limited in infrastructure, personnel, and resources, making it difficult or impossible to provide optimum care to critically ill patients and likely contributing to the dauntingly high mortality rates.

Background

The modern concept of intensive care is said to have been pioneered by an anesthetist in Denmark over half a century ago during the polio pandemic [1]. Since then, intensive care units (ICUs) have significantly improved the quality of care and outcomes of critically ill and injured patients, predominantly in high-resource settings [24].

In sub-Saharan Africa, ICUs have varying qualities and quantities of infrastructure necessary for the provision of proper critical cares services [5, 6]. The reported disease characteristics and mortality rates of patients admitted to ICUs in sub-Saharan Africa vary widely from one population to another [79]. In a study of severe head injury patients in the ICU of National Hospital Abuja in Nigeria, the mortality rate was 68.4%, [10] while in another study of neurological and obstetric patients, the mortality rates were 43.5% and 33% respectively [11, 12]. A similar study of critical care obstetric patients in Burkina Faso revealed a mortality rate of 60%, [13] while the mortality rate in the general ICU population in Uganda was found to be 25% [14].

Tanzania, a low-income country in East Africa with a population of 44 million, has four main referral hospitals, which are located in zones so as to serve as a tertiary level referral centers. These hospitals are Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC) in the Northern zone, Bugando Medical Centre (BMC) in the Western zone, Mbeya Referral Hospital (MRH) in the Southern highlands zone, and Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH) which serves the coastal zone (Figure 1). MNH also serves as the National Referral Hospital, receiving patients from all hospitals in Tanzania, including the three named referral hospitals [15]. These are public access hospitals with government funding, and the only ones with specialized ICU care for patients with critical illness within the public system. In general, patients pay a standard fee scaled to income for hospital admission whether or not it also includes ICU admission; ability to pay is not a factor in deciding the ICU admission. A small number of private hospitals with semi-tertiary capacity provide specialized ICU care; however these services are not freely accessible to the general public.
Figure 1

Map of Tanzania showing location of the four referral hospitals. Source: http://www.tanzania.go.tz; Accessed 26.06.2014.

All four referral hospitals have ICU services that operate with varying levels of equipment and staff. The regional hospitals in the respective zones usually send their sickest patients to these referral hospitals for ICU and other specialized care. The disease patterns and clinical outcomes of the patients admitted in the ICU of these four referral hospitals are unknown. In this study we aim to describe the disease patterns and clinical outcomes of patients admitted to the ICUs of these Tanzanian referral hospitals.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of patients admitted to the ICUs of the four public tertiary referral hospitals of Tanzania (MNH, KCMC, BMC, and MRH) for the three year period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011.

These ICUs are dedicated patient care areas at each of the four hospitals, specifically tasked with caring for critically ill and injured patients. They serve all such patients regardless of diagnosis (medical, surgical, trauma, etc.) and age (adult and paediatric).

Trained physician abstractors analyzed patient care log books, attendance registers, nurses' report books, and death certificates. Separate information was obtained on the basic characteristics of each of the ICUs, including human resources and available medical equipment. The information was recorded on a structured questionnaire that was developed by a consensus process among the investigators based on the elements from previous literature [68]. Study data, including basic demographics and primary diagnoses, were transferred from the hand-written data forms into an Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and then manually coded into Clinical Classifications Software (CCS) multi-level categories (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, USA) [16]. All of the CCS categorizations were reviewed by at least two physician researchers, and any disagreements were mediated by a third physician.

Procedure, frequency, and univariate functions were performed to check for any outliers and to clean the dataset. The descriptive statistics including the total number of patients admitted to each ICU, gender distribution, and age groups were calculated. Additional study data included: 1) the frequencies and average length of ICU stay for each CCS diagnosis category; 2) the rates and causes of ICU deaths; and 3) the in-ICU mortality rates for each diagnoses, calculated as the number of deaths of patients given a particular diagnoses divided by the total number of patients with that diagnosis.

In addition we report the aggregate categories of Infectious disease, trauma, post-operative observation, disease of circulatory system and pregnancy related. Each aggregate category includes all of the relevant individual CCS multilevel diagnoses.

This retrospective analysis was approved by the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) Institutional Review Board.

Results

Intensive care unit characteristics

MNH is the largest referral hospital with 1300 beds, while MRH is the smallest with 480 beds. MNH had the largest ratio of hospital to ICU beds (217:1) while KCMC had the smallest (39:1).

MNH and BMC had one cardiac monitor for each ICU bed, and KCMC had one monitor for three beds. There was one ventilator for four ICU beds at KCMC, while MNH had a one for each bed. MNH had one infusion pump for each bed, KCMC had none. None of the ICUs had a point-of-care (POC) arterial blood gas (ABG) analyzer or the ability to monitor central venous pressure (CVP).

BMC had the lowest physician-to-patients’ ratio (1:1146). The lowest nurse-to-patient ratio was observed at KCMC (1:77). None of the ICUs had an Intensive Care-trained medical specialist or a nutritionist. A critical care nurse was available only at MNH, and a respiratory therapist was available only at KCMC.

The availability of ICU resources is shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Intensive care unit characteristics

 

Hospitals

 

MNH

BMC

KCMC

MRH

Hospital bed capacity

1300

650

540

480

ICU RESOURCES

    

ICU bed capacity

6

12

14

6

Ventilators

6

5

4

4

Cardiac monitors

6

12

5

3

Oxygen supply ports

12

14

7

4

Invasive BP monitoring (arterial line)

0

0

0

0

CVP monitoring capacity

0

0

0

0

Arterial blood gas analyzer

0

0

0

0

Portable ultrasound

0

0

0

1

Portable X-ray

1

1

1

1

Infusion pumps

6

4

0

2

ECG machine

0

0

1

0

Renal replacement therapy

0*

0

0

0

Capnography monitoring capacity

0

0

0

0

ICU STAFFING

    

Number of fellowship-trained intensivists

0

0

0

0

Number specialist anaesthesiologists

4

2

3

1

Number of masters-trained critical care nurses

1

0

0

0

Number of nutritionists

0

0

0

0

Number of respiratory therapists

0

0

1

0

Nurse to patient ratio**

1:2

1:4

1:4

1:2

Physician to patient ratio***

1:6

1:12

1:14

1:6

*Since the date of our study, MNH has introduced hemodialysis.

**The ratio is based on an 8 hour staffing coverage, all ICU follow an 8 hour shift system.

***The ratio is based on a daily coverage.

ICU-Intensive Care Unit.

CVP- central venous pressure.

ECG- Electrocardiography.

MNH-Muhimbili National Hospital.

BMC-Bugando Medical Centre.

KCMC-Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre.

MRH-Mbeya Referral Hospital.

ICU patients’ demographics

During the study period, 5627 patients were admitted to ICU. Male patients comprised the majority of the study population, male: female ratio of 1.4:1. The median age of study population was 34 years, with an interquartile range of 21–53 years (Table 2).
Table 2

ICU patient demographics

 

Overall N = 5627

MNH N = 1154

BMC N = 2292

KCMC N = 1608

MRH N = 573

Gender

Male

57.5%

55.5%

53.6%

57.9%

53.6%

Female

41.8%

41.8%

45.8%

41.9%

45.8%

No gender data

0.7%

2.7%

0.6%

0.2%

0.6%

Median age in years (Interquartile Range)

34 (21–53)

34 (24–52)

30 (15–48)

36 (21–52)

37 (24–56)

Age groups (Years)

<5

12.1%

6.2%

11.3%

6.4%

11.3%

5-17

10.5%

15.0%

9.8%

9.5%

9.8%

≥18-65

70.4%

72.1%

75.5%

73.3%

72.6%

>65

5.6%

4.3%

3.2%

9.8%

6.1%

No age data

1.4%

2.4%

0.2%

1.0%

0.2%

Overall In-ICU mortality

2331 (41.4%)

N = 5627

Overall length of ICU stay in days

5 [3, 11]

Median (Q1,Q3)

MNH-Muhimbili National Hospital.

BMC-Bugando Medical Centre.

KCMC-Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre.

MRH-Mbeya Referral Hospital.

Top ICU diagnoses and disease categories by age group

Intracranial injury was the most frequent admission diagnosis for all age groups. Post-operative observation, the second most frequent admission diagnosis had lowest in-ICU mortality.

In pediatric patients aged less than 5 years, non-TB pneumonia was the leading cause of ICU admission, and had the highest in-ICU mortality.

The top ICU diagnoses by age group are shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Top ICU diagnoses by age group

Top 10 diagnoses for adults and all ages (including age unknown)

CCS category

As % of all patients N = 5627

As % of adult patients (≥18 years) N = 4277

Length of ICU stay in days median (Q1,Q3) (All ages)

In-ICU mortality (All ages)

Intracranial injury

703 (12.5%)

665 (15.5%)

5 (3,12)

280 (39.8%)

Post-operative observation*

597 (10.6%)

461 (10.8%)

1 (1,2)

73 (12.2%)

Injury and poisoning

400 (7.1%)

321 (7.5%)

4 (2,9)

189 (47.3%)

Other intestinal obstruction

360 (6.4%)

248 (5.8%)

3 (2,7)

141 (39.2%)

Acute but ill-defined cerebrovascular accident

360 (6.4%)

360 (8.4%)

6 (4,11)

247 (68.6%)

Complications of pregnancy; childbirth; and the puerperium

315 (5.6%)

253 (5.9%)

5 (2,9)

109 (34.6%)

Diabetes with ketoacidosis or uncontrolled diabetes

298 (5.3%)

259 (6.1%)

5 (2,7)

113 (37.9%)

Peritonitis and intestinal abscess

264 (4.7%)

221 (5.2%)

4 (2,9)

137 (51.9%)

Hypertension with complications and secondary hypertension

191 (3.4%)

191 (4.5%)

4 (2,7)

95 (49.7%)

Pneumonia (except that caused by TB)

174 (3.1%)

101 (2.4%)

3 (2,5)

130 (74.7%)

Top 5 diagnosis in very young children (<5 years)

CCS category

As % of age group N = 681

Length of ICU stay in days median (Q1,Q3)

In-ICU mortality

Pneumonia (except that caused by TB)

86 (12.6%)

3 (1,10)

70 (81.4%)

Infectious and parasitic diseases**

69 (10.1%)

3 (1,9)

48 (69.6%)

Meningitis (except that caused by TB or STD)

65 (9.5%)

5 (3,11)

47 (72.3%)

Septicaemia (except in labor)

49 (7.2%)

4 (2,12)

39 (79.6%)

Post-operative observation*

41 (6.0%)

2 (1,4)

7 (17.1)

*Not a CCS category but was used for patients admitted to the ICU for Immediate post-surgical observation (after both elective and non-elective procedures).

**This category was used exclusively for Malaria cases, for which there is no disease-specific CCS category.

Top disease categories by ICU for all ages

Non communicable disease categories (trauma, post-operative observation, disease of circulatory system and pregnancy related conditions) accounted for over half of the admission diagnoses (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Top disease categories by ICU for all ages.

In-ICU mortality

The overall in-ICU mortality was 41.4% (Table 2). Among patients of all age groups, renal failure (acute and chronic), shock, burns and septicemia were conditions with the highest in-ICU mortality rate of over 80% each. Tetanus had the longest median of ICU stay, and an in-ICU mortality of 71.1%. In pediatric patients aged less than 5 years, non-TB pneumonia had the highest in-ICU mortality (Table 4).
Table 4

Conditions with highest in-ICU mortality

Conditions with highest in-ICU mortality for all ages

CCS category

As % of all patients N = 5627

Length of ICU stay in days median (Q1,Q3)

In-ICU mortality

Chronic renal failure

23 (0.4%)

2 (1,4)

21 (91.3%)

Acute renal failure

51 (0.9%)

2 (1,3)

45 (88.2%)

Shock

90 (1.6%)

2 (1,5)

78 (86.7%)

Burns

56 (1.0%)

6 (2,9)

48 (85.7%)

Septicaemia (except in labor)

68 (1.2%)

4 (2,12)

55 (80.9%)

Pneumonia (except that caused by TB)

174 (3.1%)

3 (2,5)

130 (74.7%)

Other bacterial infections***

135 (2.4%)

8 (5,13)

96 (71.1%)

Acute but ill-defined cerebrovascular accident

360 (6.4%)

6 (4,11)

247 (68.6%)

Meningitis (except that caused by TB or STD)

140 (2.5%)

4 (3,13)

94 (67.1%)

Acute myocardial infarction

45 (0.8%)

5 (4,9)

27 (60.0%)

Top 5 pediatric (<5 years) conditions with highest in-ICU mortality

CCS category

As % of age group N = 681

Length of ICU stay in days median (Q1,Q3)

In-ICU mortality

Pneumonia (except that caused by TB)

86 (12.6%)

3 (1,10)

70 (81.4%)

Septicaemia (except in labor)

49 (7.2%)

4 (2,12)

39 (79.6%)

Meningitis (except that caused by TB or STD)

65 (9.5%)

5 (3,11)

47 (72.3%)

Infectious and parasitic diseases**

69 (10.1%)

3 (1,9)

48 (69.6%)

Fluid and electrolyte disorders

15 (2.2%)

3 (2,6)

10 (66.7%)

**All were Malaria cases, for which there is no specific CCS category.

***All were Tetanus cases, for which there is no specific CCS category.

Discussion

In this retrospective review, our findings of very high relative mortality and the substantial essential resource gaps suggests that all four tertiary referral hospitals of Tanzania significantly lack the necessary resources and infrastructure for the provision of high-quality intensive care to critically ill patients. Similar to the published literature on the state of ICUs in other developing countries [7, 8, 1619] we found that none of the ICUs components reviewed met the minimum standards of basic requirements of an intensive care unit, as per multi-national consensus or professional bodies recommendations [2, 20].

In all ICUs, the percentage of beds is far below internationally recommended standard of 5-10% of the overall hospital beds [2124]. Half of the ICUs had less than one cardiac monitor per bed, none had CVP monitoring capacity for volume assessment in patients, and all ICUs lack the ability to perform bedside ABG analysis, a core component of care in critically ill and ventilated patients [25, 26]. This shortage poses an enormous challenge to the care of critically ill patients, and though this was not the subject of our study, per discussions with providers in each of these hospitals, there is a general conviction that ICU care is not available for many patients who need it.

There is a significant shortage of intensive care providers in all the ICUs; none of the ICUs have fellowship-trained critical care specialists, and only one hospital has a master’s-trained critical care nurse. The care of patients in the ICU is therefore dependent on just a few available anesthesiologists, internists, or surgeons, while nursing care is provided by ordinary nurses without formal critical care training. These findings are similar to a recent survey of a convenience sample of 10 regional hospitals in Tanzania, which found a significant lack of critical care infrastructure, resources and training [27].

The patient population in this study is younger compared with patients admitted to ICUs in most of developed world [28, 29], a similar demographic finding to other studies of ICUs in sub-Saharan Africa which have reported a predominantly young-age ICU population [8, 22, 30, 31]. The overall young population and male predominance in our study, may in some extent, reflect the prevalence of trauma, long shown to have a working age male predominance [32]. Another factor that may also affect median age is the admitting providers’ views on the prognosis of older patients; however, we did not address admission decision making in our study.

Paediatric patients under the age of five years accounted for 12.1% of the study population, a modest volume, but we suspect this proportion is still artificially low based on prior studies of critically ill-children in our settings [31, 33, 34]. This statistic reflects a severe shortage of dedicated, age-appropriate ICU capacity, even at the top level referral hospitals in Tanzania.

Non-communicable disease conditions accounted for most of the ICU admissions, with trauma alone constituting over twenty percent, highlighting the growing burden of non-communicable diseases within Sub-Saharan Africa, as shown in previous studies [35, 36]. The regional practice of restricting admission of potentially infectious patients to ICU units may have also resulted in the triage of even critically ill patients with communicable disease to lower levels of care, inflating the proportion of non-communicable diseases in the ICU, For example, all of the ICU in Tanzania place some limits on admission of patients with TB, HIV or Hepatitis C, regardless of acuity.

Intracranial injury was the most common reason for ICU admission in both adult and overall populations and carried a substantial in-ICU mortality, similar to findings in previous studies in other developing countries [30, 37, 38]. Among the top ten ICU diagnoses, patients with non-TB pneumonia had the highest in-ICU mortality, potentially because these were HIV/AIDS patients with pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP), known to carry a high in-ICU mortality, even in area of high resources [39].

In pediatric patients aged less than 5 years, non-TB pneumonia was the commonest reason of ICU admission and carried the highest in-ICU mortality. This observation is consistent with previous studies indicating both the high prevalence and acuity of pediatric pneumonia patients from similar settings [40, 41].

The overall in-ICU mortality rate of 41.4%, is comparable to other studies in Africa [30], but much higher than mortality reports in developed countries [28, 42]. Similarly, the median length of ICU stay in our study is also comparable to that of ICUs in other parts of Sub-Saharan Africa [30]. Among patients of all age groups, chronic renal failure, acute renal failure, shock, burns, and septicemia each had in-ICU mortality rates of over eighty percent. During the study period, none of the referral hospitals were offering dialysis services for renal failure patients, a fact that may partially account for such high mortality rate observed. Lack of dedicated burn ICU personnel and resources, along with likelihood of high severity (high percentage burns, deep burns, inhalational burns, or sepsis) of patients admitted in ICUs may explain the reason for high in-ICU mortality among burn patients. Finally, like previous studies done in similar settings [43], patients with tetanus had the longest median length of ICU stay, and carried an in-ICU mortality of around 71%.

Limitations

The limitations of this study include the retrospective design and the relative paucity of clinical data available in the attendance registers, nurses' report books, and death certificates.

The available data only supported categorization of patients by the primary diagnosis and the specific means by which the clinicians arrived at theses diagnoses is unclear. Also, the lack of referral data on patients admitted to the ICU limits our ability to speculate on the mortality impact due to lack of access to critical care in district and regional hospitals referring patients to these centers. Physiologic data necessary to calculate severity of illness or injury, such as the Apache score or Injury Severity Score, were lacking. Likewise, this study provides quantitative data on the available ICU personnel and resources, but not on the specific quality of care delivered. Owing to these limitations we did not feel it appropriate to make direct comparisons of mortality across the four study centres.

Conclusion

This study clearly demonstrates that the ICUs in tertiary referral hospitals of Tanzania are severely limited in infrastructure, personnel, and resources, making it difficult or impossible to provide optimum care to critically ill patients and likely contributing to the dauntingly high mortality rates. While further research is necessary to characterize standardized severity scores of ICU patients and measure the quality of care delivered in these units to allow for bench-marking and comparison between facilities, health policy initiatives should focus on increasing ICU capacity in Tanzania.

Abbreviations

ICU: 

Intensive care unit

CVP: 

Central venous pressure

ECG: 

Electrocardiography

MNH: 

Muhimbili National Hospital

BMC: 

Bugando medical centre

KCMC: 

Kilimanjaro Christian medical centre

MRH: 

Mbeya referral hospital.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Dr Rodrick Kabangila, Dr Peter Kishimbo, Prof M.Moshi, Dr Hedwiga Swai, Angelina Sepeku, Hadija Juma, Victoria Mlele.

Keegan Chackett, Brittany Murray and Heike Geduld, for useful comments and additions on the designing the tables of contents.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Emergency Medicine Department, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences
(2)
Department of Medical Oncology, Ocean Road Cancer Institute
(3)
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Dodoma College of Health Sciences
(4)
Department of Surgery, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre
(5)
Department of Emergency Medicine and Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco
(6)
Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center

References

  1. Berthelsen PG, Cronqvist M: The first intensive care unit in the world: Copenhagen 1953. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003, 47 (10): 1190-1195. 10.1046/j.1399-6576.2003.00256.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Calvin JE, Habet K, Parrillo JE: Critical care in the United States. Who are we and how did we get here?. Crit Care Clin. 1997, 13 (2): 363-376. 10.1016/S0749-0704(05)70315-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bleck TP: Historical aspects of critical care and the nervous system. Crit Care Clin. 2009, 25 (1): 153-164. 10.1016/j.ccc.2008.12.004. ixView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Grenvik A, Pinsky MR: Evolution of the intensive care unit as a clinical center and critical care medicine as a discipline. Crit Care Clin. 2009, 25 (1): 239-250. 10.1016/j.ccc.2008.11.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baelani I, Jochberger S, Laimer T, Otieno D, Kabutu J, Wilson I, Baker T, Dünser MW: Availability of critical care resources to treat patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in Africa: a self-reported, continent-wide survey of anaesthesia providers. Crit Care. 2011, 15 (1): R10-10.1186/cc9410.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Dünser MW, Baelani I, Ganbold L: A review and analysis of intensive care medicine in the least developed countries. Crit Care Med. 2006, 34 (4): 1234-1242. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000208360.70835.87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Oke DA: Medical admission into the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2001, 8 (4): 179-182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Okafor UV: Challenges in critical care services in Sub-Saharan Africa: perspectives from Nigeria. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2009, 13 (1): 25-27. 10.4103/0972-5229.53112.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Merah NA, Okeke CI, Olatosi JO: An audit of surgical admissions to the intensive care unit of the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (1997–2002). Niger Postgrad Med J. 2006, 13 (2): 153-156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ohaegbulam SC, Okafor UV, Ihekire O, Elumelu E: Using the revised trauma score to predict outcome in severely head injured patients in a developing nation – a pilot study. Journal of College of Medicine. 2008, 12 (2): 51-55.Google Scholar
  11. Okafor UV, Aniebue U: Admission pattern and outcome in critical care obstetric patients. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2004, 13 (3): 164-166. 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.04.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Okafor UV, Onwuekwe I: Disease patterns and outcome for medical neurological patients admitted to a multi-disciplinary intensive care unit. Journal of College of Medicine. 2004, 9 (2): 113-115.Google Scholar
  13. Dao B, Rouamba A, Ouédraogo D, Kambou T, Bazié AJ: [Transfer of obstetric patients in a pregnant and postpartum condition to an intensive care unit: eighty-two cases in Burkina Faso]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2003, 31 (2): 123-126. 10.1016/S1297-9589(03)00006-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gomersall CD: Critical care in the developing world - a challenge for us all. Crit Care. 2010, 14 (2): 131-10.1186/cc8871.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. MOH T: The Tanzania National Website [Internet]. [cited 2012 Dec 23]. Available from: http://www.tanzania.go.tz/home/pages/16
  16. NIH: Clinical classifications software source information [internet]. [cited 2014 Jun 25]. Available from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/sourcereleasedocs/current/CCS/
  17. Fernando J, Wickramaratne C, Dissanayake R, Kolambage S, Aminda M, Cooray N: Studying current status of intensive care services in Sri Lanka. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2012, 2 (1): 11-16. 10.4103/2229-5151.94884.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Size M, Borgstein ES, Haisma HJ: One-year audit of admissions to the Intensive Care Unit of the Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital. Blantyre Malawi Medical Journal. 2005, 17 (1): 12-13.Google Scholar
  19. Baker T: Critical care in low-income countries. Trop Med Int Health. 2009, 14 (2): 143-148. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02202.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Valentin A, Ferdinande P, ESICM Working Group on Quality Improvement: Recommendations on basic requirements for intensive care units: structural and organizational aspects. Intensive Care Med. 2011, 37 (10): 1575-1587. 10.1007/s00134-011-2300-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wild C, Narath M: Evaluating and planning ICUs: methods and approaches to differentiate between need and demand. Health Policy. 2005, 71 (3): 289-301. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.12.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wunsch H, Angus DC, Harrison DA, Collange O, Fowler R, Hoste EAJ: Variation in critical care services across North America and Western Europe. Crit Care Med. 2008, 36 (10): 2787-2793. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186aec8. e1–9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hutchings A, Durand MA, Grieve R, Harrison D, Rowan K, Green J: Evaluation of modernisation of adult critical care services in England: time series and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2009, 339 (nov11 2): b4353-10.1136/bmj.b4353.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Bertolini G, Rossi C, Brazzi L, Radrizzani D, Rossi G, Arrighi E: The relationship between labour cost per patient and the size of intensive care units: a multicentre prospective study. Intensive Care Med. 2003, 29 (12): 2307-2311. 10.1007/s00134-003-2019-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Raffin TA: Indications for arterial blood gas analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1986, 105 (3): 390-398. 10.7326/0003-4819-105-3-390.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gilbert HC, Vender JS: Arterial blood gas monitoring. Crit Care Clin. 1995, 11 (1): 233-248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Baker T, Lugazia E, Eriksen J, Mwafongo V, Irestedt L, Konrad D: Emergency and critical care services in Tanzania: a survey of ten hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013, 13: 140-10.1186/1472-6963-13-140.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Moran JL, Bristow P, Solomon PJ, George C, Hart GK: Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Database Management Committee (ADMC). Mortality and length-of-stay outcomes, 1993–2003, in the binational Australian and New Zealand intensive care adult patient database. Crit Care Med. 2008, 36 (1): 46-61. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000295313.08084.58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Towey RM, Ojara S: Intensive care in the developing world. Anaesthesia. 2007, 62: 32-37. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05295.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kwizera A, Dünser M, Nakibuuka J: National intensive care unit bed capacity and ICU patient characteristics in a low income country. BMC Research Notes. 2012, 5 (1): 475-10.1186/1756-0500-5-475.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Mhando S, Young B, Lakhoo K: The scope of emergency paediatric surgery in Tanzania. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008, 24 (2): 219-222. 10.1007/s00383-007-2072-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Bowman B, Seedat M, Duncan N, Kobusingye O: Violence and injuries. Disease and Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa [Internet]. Edited by: Jamison DT, Feachem RG, Makgoba MW, Bos ER, Baingana FK, Hofman KJ. 2006, Washington (DC): World Bank, [cited 2014 Jun 29]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21290665, 2Google Scholar
  33. Font F, Quinto L, Masanja H, Nathan R, Ascaso C, Menendez C: Paediatric referrals in rural Tanzania: the Kilombero District Study - a case series. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2002, 2 (1): 4-10.1186/1472-698X-2-4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Reynolds T, Sawe HR, Lobue N, Mwafongo V: 107 most frequent adult and pediatric diagnoses among 60,000 patients seen in a New urban emergency department in Dar Es Salaam. Tanzania Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2012, 60 (4): S39-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Naghavi M, Forouzanfar MH: Burden of non-communicable diseases in sub-Saharan Africa in 1990 and 2010: global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors study 2010. Lancet. 2013, 381: S95-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Mayige M, Kagaruki G, Ramaiya K, Swai A: Non communicable diseases in Tanzania: a call for urgent action. Tanzania Journal of Health Research [Internet]. 2012, [cited 2014 Jun 26]; 13(5). Available from: http://www.ajol.info/index.php/thrb/article/view/71079 Google Scholar
  37. An audit of One-year intensive care practice in a developing country. The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology [Internet]. 2008, [cited 2013 Sep 27]; 18(2). Available from: http://ispub.com/IJA/18/2/12676
  38. Chalya PL, Gilyoma JM, Dass RM, Mchembe MD, Matasha M, Mabula JB: Trauma admissions to the intensive care unit at a reference hospital in Northwestern Tanzania. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011, 19: 61-10.1186/1757-7241-19-61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Wachter RM, Russi MB, Bloch DA, Hopewell PC, Luce JM: Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and respiratory failure in AIDS. Improved outcomes and increased use of intensive care units. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991, 143 (2): 251-256. 10.1164/ajrccm/143.2.251.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Singh V: The burden of pneumonia in children: an Asian perspective. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2005, 6 (2): 88-93. 10.1016/j.prrv.2005.03.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Rudan I, Boschi-Pinto C, Biloglav Z, Mulholland K, Campbell H: Epidemiology and etiology of childhood pneumonia. Bull World Health Organ. 2008, 86 (5): 408-416. 10.2471/BLT.07.048769.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. De Jonge E, Bosman RJ, van der Voort PH, Korsten HH, Scheffer GJ, de Keizer NF: Intensive care medicine in the Netherlands, 1997–2001. I. Patient population and treatment outcome. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003, 147 (21): 1013-1017.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mchembe MD, Victor M: Tetanus and its treatment outcome in Dar Es Salaam: need for male vaccination. East Afr J Public Health. 2005, 2 (2): 22-23.Google Scholar
  44. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/14/26/prepub

Copyright

© Sawe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement