Awareness and practice of patient's rights law in Lithuania
© Ducinskiene et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 02 July 2005
Accepted: 02 September 2006
Published: 02 September 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|2 Jul 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Nov 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amanda Burls|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Jan 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amanda Burls|
|31 May 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Danute Ducinskiene|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|31 May 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Jun 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amanda Burls|
|14 Jul 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Danute Ducinskiene|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|14 Jul 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|1 Sep 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Danute Ducinskiene|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|1 Sep 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|2 Sep 2006||Editorially accepted|
|2 Sep 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-698X-6-10|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.