Barriers to the effective treatment and prevention of malaria in Africa: A systematic review of qualitative studies
© Maslove et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 18 February 2009
Accepted: 25 October 2009
Published: 25 October 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Feb 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Mar 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Myfanwy Morgan|
|17 Apr 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Thomas|
|11 Aug 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Edward Mills|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Aug 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Aug 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Thomas|
|2 Oct 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Edward Mills|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 Oct 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Oct 2009||Editorially accepted|
|25 Oct 2009||Article published||10.1186/1472-698X-9-26|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.