The decentralisation-centralisation dilemma: recruitment and distribution of health workers in remote districts of Tanzania
© Munga et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 08 September 2008
Accepted: 30 April 2009
Published: 30 April 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Sep 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Oct 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Atkinson|
|21 Oct 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Barbara Isobel McPake|
|21 Jan 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Aloyce Munga|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Jan 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Feb 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Atkinson|
|12 Mar 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Barbara Isobel McPake|
|27 Apr 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Aloyce Munga|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Apr 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Apr 2009||Editorially accepted|
|30 Apr 2009||Article published||10.1186/1472-698X-9-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.