Methods to increase reporting of childhood sexual abuse in surveys: the sensitivity and specificity of face-to-face interviews versus a sealed envelope method in Ugandan primary school children
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 26 May 2016
Accepted: 20 December 2016
Published: 23 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 May 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Manuel Contreras-Urbina|
|17 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sue Woolfenden|
|14 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Anna Louise Barr|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Dec 2016||Editorially accepted|
|23 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12914-016-0110-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.