Open Peer Review Reports for: Equity in HIV testing: evidence from a cross-sectional study in ten Southern African countries
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
18 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Madri Jansen van Rensburg |
1 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stefan Baral |
13 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Steven Mitchell |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
13 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Steven Mitchell |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
13 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
12 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stefan Baral |
1 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Steven Mitchell |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
9 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Steven Mitchell |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
9 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
10 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Steven Mitchell |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
10 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
13 Sep 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Sep 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-698X-10-23 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.