Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Equity in HIV testing: evidence from a cross-sectional study in ten Southern African countries

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Apr 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
18 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Madri Jansen van Rensburg
1 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stefan Baral
13 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Steven Mitchell
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Steven Mitchell
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stefan Baral
1 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Steven Mitchell
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
9 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Steven Mitchell
Resubmission - Version 6
9 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
10 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Steven Mitchell
Resubmission - Version 8
10 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
13 Sep 2010 Editorially accepted
13 Sep 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-698X-10-23

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement