Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Use of traditional medicine for the treatment of diabetes in Eastern Uganda: a qualitative exploration of reasons for choice

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Sep 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Elizeus Rutebemberwa
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Linda Kahn
9 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katarina Hjelm
18 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Elizeus Rutebemberwa
Resubmission - Version 3
18 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Linda Kahn
8 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Elizeus Rutebemberwa
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Elizeus Rutebemberwa
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
18 Dec 2012 Editorially accepted
2 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-698X-13-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement