Skip to main content

Table 3 Factors associated with non-utilisation of health facility for childbirth from hierarchical logistic regression analysis

From: Factors associated with non-utilisation of health service for childbirth in Timor-Leste: evidence from the 2009-2010 Demographic and Health Survey

Factor

Crude odds ratio (95% CI)

Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)

P

Maternal education

  

< 0.001

Secondary or higher

1.00

1.00

 

Primary

3.38 (2.84, 4.04)

1.47 (1.18, 1.85)

 

No education

7.33 (5.97, 9.01)

2.04 (1.56, 2.66)

 

Paternal education

  

0.010

Secondary or higher

1.00

1.00

 

Primary

2.79 (2.34, 3.34)

1.22 (0.97, 1.53)

 

No education

5.41 (4.47, 6.55)

1.45 (1.14, 1.84)

 

Maternal occupation

  

< 0.001

Not working

1.00

1.00

 

Working

1.87 (1.61, 2.17)

1.55 (1.32, 1.81)

 

Birth order

  

< 0.001

1

1.00

1.00

 

2-3

1.23 (0.99, 1.51)

1.47 (1.15, 1.87)

 

≥ 4

2.24 (1.88, 2.68)

1.78 (1.36, 2.32)

 

Frequency of antenatal care visits

  

< 0.001

≥ 4

1.00

1.00

 

1-3

1.43 (1.19, 1.72)

1.13 (0.93, 1.37)

 

0

18.85 (10.82, 32. 83)

4.68 (2.65, 8.28)

 

Antenatal service components

0.52 (0.48, 0.57)

0.72 (0.64, 0.80)

< 0.001

Wealth status

  

< 0.001

Rich (upper 20%)

1.00

1.00

 

Middle (middle 40%)

5.89 (4.73, 7.34)

2.69 (2.14, 3.37)

 

Poor (lower 40%)

19.28 (15.01, 24.76)

5.20 (3.93, 6.90)

 

Residential location

  

< 0.001

Urban

1.00

1.00

 

Rural

7.33 (5.76, 9.34)

2.83 (2.22, 3.66)

Â