Skip to main content

Table 3 Likert scale question on organization of work and supportive supervision among immunization managers and service providers by treatment group and pre- and post-test (values range from 5 = strongly agree to 1 = strongly disagree).

From: The role of supportive supervision on immunization program outcome - a randomized field trial from Georgia

 

Mean values and SD from Likert scale

Immunization managers

Treatment group

Pre-test (N = 14, 12)

Post-test (N = 31,15)

1. I am satisfied with organization of work in their CPH

Intervention

3.60 (0.83)

3.87 (0.85)

 

Control

3.87 (0.64)

3.60 (0.83)

 

ANOVA

P = 0.33

P = 0.31

2. The overall work environment is good in our CPH

Intervention

3.47 (0.99)

3.58 (0.92)

 

Control

3.20 (1.01)

3.40 (0.83)

 

ANOVA

P = 0.47

P = 0.52

3. Feel capable of carrying out supportive supervision

Intervention

4.13 (0.35)

4.52 (0.51)

 

Control

3.87 (0.64)

4.53 (0.52)

 

ANOVA

P = 0.17

P = 0.92

4. Possess sufficient knowledge to carry out supportive supervision

Intervention

3.00 (0.75)

4.45 (0.62)

 

Control

3.20 (0.77)

3.33 (1.05)

 

ANOVA

P = 0.48

P = 0.000

5. Are professionally motivated to provide supportive supervision to subordinated staff on a regular basis

Intervention

4.20 (0.41)

4.45 (0.51)

 

Control

4.13 (0.35)

4.27 (0.46)

 

ANOVA

P = 0.64

P = 0.24

6. Are financially motivated to provide supportive supervision to subordinated staff on a regular basis

Intervention

2.40 (0.63)

3.32 (1.08)

 

Control

2.27 (0.70)

3.47 (1.30)

 

ANOVA

P = 0.59

P = 0.69

Immunization service providers

Treatment group

Pre-test (N = 197, 195)

Post-test (N = 282, 239)

1. Organization of work in their facility is not good

Intervention

2.56 (0.94)

2.24 (0.86)

 

Control

2.38 (0.96)

2.33 (0.94)

 

ANOVA

P = 0.058

P = 0.27

2. Feel they need supervision from immunization managers

Intervention

3.73 (0.90)

3.58 (0.83)

 

Control

3.40 (0.98)

3.41 (0.95)

 

ANOVA

P = 0.01

P = 0.033