Table 3 Methodological quality of systematic reviews and randomised trials primary studies included in this study.
From: Increasing the demand for childhood vaccination in developing countries: a systematic review
Systematic review | AMSTAR | Quality Score (Percent of maximum) | Primary study | SIGN 50* | Percent quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pegurri et al 2004 [3] | 1. No | 18% | Brugha 1996 [22] | 6/10 | 60% |
2. No | |||||
3. Yes | |||||
4. No | |||||
5. No | |||||
6. No | |||||
7. Yes | |||||
8. No | |||||
9. Can't answer | |||||
10. No | |||||
11. No | |||||
Batt 2004 [14] | 1. No | 27% | Andersson 2008 [6] | 6/10 | 60% |
2. No | |||||
3. Yes | |||||
4. Yes | |||||
5. No | |||||
6. No | |||||
7. Yes | |||||
8. Can't answer | |||||
9. Can't answer | |||||
10. No | |||||
11. No | |||||
Haines 2007 [15] | 1. No | 18% | |||
2. No | |||||
3. Yes | |||||
4. yes | |||||
5. No | |||||
6. No | |||||
7. No | |||||
8. No | |||||
9. No | |||||
10. No | |||||
11. No | |||||
Ryman 2008 [5] | 1. No | 36% | |||
2. No | |||||
3. Yes | |||||
4. Yes | |||||
5. No | |||||
6. Yes | |||||
7. Yes | |||||
8. No | |||||
9. Can't answer | |||||
10. No | |||||
11. No |