Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 5 Comparison of those who disclosed in the FTFI and SEM (true positive repondents) to those who disclosed in the SEM (false negative respondents)

From: Methods to increase reporting of childhood sexual abuse in surveys: the sensitivity and specificity of face-to-face interviews versus a sealed envelope method in Ugandan primary school children

  N = 268 Percent aOR 95% CI P
Sex
 Male 0 0    
 Female 35 21.5 n/at   
Age (years)
 <13 11 12.1 1   
 13–14 19 13.9 1.11 (0.38, 3.25) 0.854
 >14 5 12.8 2.00 (0.34, 11.71) 0.439
Primary Level
 P5 20 17.1 1   
 P6 10 12.8 0.48 (0.18, 1.31) 0.154
 P7 5 6.9 0.24 (0.06, 0.94) 0.040
Self-reported disability
 No difficulties 19 10.1 1   
 Some difficulties 14 20.3 2.33 (0.89, 6.05) 0.083
 Disability 2 20.0 1.35 (0.20, 9.32) 0.761
Reported experience of other forms of sexual violence 23 41.1 5.59 (2.23, 14.04) <0.001
Intervention school 17 10.6 0.53 (0.21, 1.34) 0.178
  1. aOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence intervals
  2. t not available due to small cell size
  3. P values derived from Wald tests
  4. Each factor is adjusted for the other variables in the model and controlled for interviewer random effects and clustering by school