Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of those who disclosed in the FTFI and SEM (true positive repondents) to those who disclosed in the SEM (false negative respondents)

From: Methods to increase reporting of childhood sexual abuse in surveys: the sensitivity and specificity of face-to-face interviews versus a sealed envelope method in Ugandan primary school children

 

N = 268

Percent

aOR

95% CI

P

Sex

 Male

0

0

   

 Female

35

21.5

n/at

  

Age (years)

 <13

11

12.1

1

  

 13–14

19

13.9

1.11

(0.38, 3.25)

0.854

 >14

5

12.8

2.00

(0.34, 11.71)

0.439

Primary Level

 P5

20

17.1

1

  

 P6

10

12.8

0.48

(0.18, 1.31)

0.154

 P7

5

6.9

0.24

(0.06, 0.94)

0.040

Self-reported disability

 No difficulties

19

10.1

1

  

 Some difficulties

14

20.3

2.33

(0.89, 6.05)

0.083

 Disability

2

20.0

1.35

(0.20, 9.32)

0.761

Reported experience of other forms of sexual violence

23

41.1

5.59

(2.23, 14.04)

<0.001

Intervention school

17

10.6

0.53

(0.21, 1.34)

0.178

  1. aOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence intervals
  2. t not available due to small cell size
  3. P values derived from Wald tests
  4. Each factor is adjusted for the other variables in the model and controlled for interviewer random effects and clustering by school