Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
1 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ingvild Fossgard Sandoy
7 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Webster Mavhu
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Dec 2016 Editorially accepted
9 Jan 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12914-016-0111-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.