Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Sex work stigma and non-disclosure to health care providers: data from a large RDS study among FSW in Brazil

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joanna Busza
2 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - K Biello
30 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ines Dourado
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joanne Csete
25 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - K Biello
26 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ines Dourado
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joanne Csete
21 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ines Dourado
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joanne Csete
13 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Ines Dourado
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
25 Jan 2019 Editorially accepted
5 Mar 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12914-019-0193-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement