Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Health care providers’ and mothers’ perceptions about the medicalization of female genital mutilation or cutting in Egypt: a cross-sectional qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Oct 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samuel Kimani
10 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - GI Serour
7 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catrin Evans
28 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Omaima El-Gibaly
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Omaima El-Gibaly
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Omaima El-Gibaly
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Omaima El-Gibaly
Resubmission - Version 5
13 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 May 2019 Editorially accepted
27 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12914-019-0202-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement