Skip to main content

Table 5 Past year emotional and physical violence by family members other than husbands (all participants)

From: Community mobilisation to prevent violence against women and girls in eastern India through participatory learning and action with women’s groups facilitated by accredited social health activists: a before-and-after pilot study

 

Baseline

Endline

Unadjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) 1

P

Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) 2

P

n

%3

n

%3

    

Past year emotional violence by other family members

 Yes

448

66.0

431

50.1

0.44 (0.35–0.56)

< 0.001

0.41 (0.32–0.53)

< 0.001

 No

231

34.0

430

49.9

    

 Total respondents

679

100

861

100

    

Past year physical violence by other family members

 Yes

184

27.1

104

12.1

0.34 (0.26–0.45)

< 0.001

0.36 (0.26–0.50)

< 0.001

 No

495

72.9

757

87.9

    

 Total respondents

679

100

861

100

    

Perpetrators of emotional and physical violence (other family members)

 Father-in-law

126

27.7

137

30.8

1.20 (0.88–1.65)

0.252

0.89 (0.62–1.28)

0.544

 Brother-in-law

75

16.5

111

24.9

1.85 (1.30–2.64)

0.001

1.96 (1.31–2.91)

0.001

 Other in-law

287

63.1

125

28.1

0.17 (0.12–0.23)

< 0.001

0.21 (0.14–0.30)

< 0.001

 Other relative

202

44.4

102

22.9

0.36 (0.26–0.50)

< 0.001

0.42 (0.29–0.60)

< 0.001

 Total respondents

455

100

445

100

    

Help-seeking for violence by other family members

 Yes

160

35.2

293

65.8

4.58 (3.25–6.45)

< 0.001

4.45 (3.04–6.52)

< 0.001

 No

463

67.9

190

35.5

    

 Total respondents

295

64.8

152

34.2

    

Persons from whom respondents sought help

 Own family

46

28.7

46

15.7

0.29 (0.17–0.51)

< 0.001

0.27 (0.14–0.52)

< 0.001

 In-laws

24

15.0

14

4.8

0.16 (0.07–0.38)

< 0.001

0.13 (0.05–0.35)

0.001

 Within village

54

33.7

104

35.5

1.17 (0.73–1.87)

0.512

1.36 (0.77–2.41)

0.286

 Total respondents

160

100

293

100

    
  1. 1 Adjusted for clustering by village with random effect term only
  2. 2 Adjusted for literacy, income regularity, socio-economic deprivation and clustering by village
  3. 3 Proportions may not add up to 100 due to missing data
  4. 4 We asked about husbands as a source of support at baseline but not endline. Data are presented without including husbands in ‘own family’