Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 4 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - asma qureshi |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 4 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 18 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Babar Tasneem Shaikh |
| 20 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean-Pierre Unger |
| 1 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - asma qureshi |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 1 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 3 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - asma qureshi |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 3 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 11 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - asma qureshi |
| 13 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean-Pierre Unger |
| 23 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Babar Tasneem Shaikh |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 11 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 8 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - asma qureshi |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 8 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 9 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 9 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-698X-10-26 |
You can find further information about peer review here.