Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 10 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Merith Cosden |
| 20 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ambros Uchtenhagen |
| 22 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kerr |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 22 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 8 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Merith Cosden |
| 9 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin McKee |
| 19 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kerr |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 19 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 18 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kerr |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 19 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kerr |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 19 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-698X-11-12 |
You can find further information about peer review here.