Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 30 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nick Crofts |
| 3 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Reidpath |
| 9 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Stoove |
| 8 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Nadia Fairbairn |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 8 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 15 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Stoove |
| 19 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nick Crofts |
| 30 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Reidpath |
| 22 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Nadia Fairbairn |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 22 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 23 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Nadia Fairbairn |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 23 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 26 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Nadia Fairbairn |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 26 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 7 Oct 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Oct 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-698X-9-24 |
You can find further information about peer review here.