Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of those who disclosed in the SEM but not the FTFI (false negative respondents) to those who did not report forced sex in either method (true negative respondents)

From: Methods to increase reporting of childhood sexual abuse in surveys: the sensitivity and specificity of face-to-face interviews versus a sealed envelope method in Ugandan primary school children

 

N = 3801

Percent

aOR

95% CI

P

Sex

 Male

105

6.1

1

  

 Female

128

6.2

0.91

(0.69, 1.21)

0.532

Age (years)

 <13

80

6.1

1

  

 13–14

118

6.1

0.98

(0.71, 1.36)

0.906

 >14

34

6.2

0.92

(0.56, 1.50)

0.725

Primary Level

 P5

97

7.1

1

  

 P6

68

5.2

0.71

(0.50, 0.99)

0.044

 P7

68

6.0

0.88

(0.60, 1.27)

0.482

Self-reported disability

 No difficulties

170

5.8

1

  

 Some difficulties

55

7.0

1.19

(0.85, 1.65)

0.307

 Disability

8

9.6

1.22

(0.55, 2.69)

0.630

Reported experience of other forms of sexual violence

33

15.6

3.32

(2.15, 5.14)

<0.001

Intervention school

144

7.4

1.60

(0.99, 2.59)

0.056

  1. aOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence intervals
  2. P values derived from Wald tests
  3. Each factor is adjusted for the other variables in the model and controlled for interviewer random effects and clustering by school